🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.